Doklam has put Russia in a quandary

India-China standoff, Doklam, Sikkim, Moscow, Russian diplomacy, Washington, RAND Corporation, Winston Churchill, Bolshevik Revolution, SCO, BRICS, Xiao Bin, Xinjiang
Russia in a spot to play a mediator

By M.K. Bhadrakumar

Through the month-long India-China standoff in Doklam near Sikkim border, Moscow has not spoken. Russian diplomacy is presumably at work. The ground is slippery, because “territorial sovereignty” is a hugely sensitive issue.

The cascading regional tensions in South Asia would have a bearing on international security. And Russia cannot but feel perturbed that relations between India and China, its two key Asian partners have reached a flashpoint. Moscow’s big worry will be that Washington may try to fish in troubled waters.

There are incipient signs already. A defense analyst in the RAND Corporation, Pentagon’s think tank, has expounded a bizarre thesis that Russia is paranoid about SCO’s growing stature as a security organization and its platform for China to expand influence in Central Asia. Therefore, in the RAND analyst’s opinion, Moscow will be quietly pleased that India is about to checkmate China within the SCO.

The underlying schadenfreude is not at all surprising. As Winston Churchill once said about the Bolshevik Revolution, SCO is a regional organization that the US wanted to throttle in its very cradle. The worst strategic nightmare for the US has been that SCO (and BRICS) might gain traction, bringing together three Asian giants under a single canopy. (It’s no coincidence that “pro-American” lobbyists in India happen to be the most trenchant critics of SCO and BRICS.)

Where the RAND analyst badly fumbled is in his naivete that Russia stands to gain if SCO gets paralysed. On the contrary, given the deep chill in the US-Russia relations, Moscow’s need for strategic depth is greater today than ever before.

Having said that, the RAND analyst is estimating correctly that India-China tensions might slow down SCO’s functioning. Chinese commentators also voice disquiet on this score. A top Chinese think tanker Xiao Bin, deputy secretary-general of the SCO Research Center affiliated to the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, wrote,

Given the tensions over China-India relations, India will bring its mentality of counterbalancing China to the SCO, and thwart initiatives favouring China. India’s membership at the SCO creates a structural quagmire for the organization. Soon after joining the SCO, India frequently caused friction over its border with China. For this reason, the SCO is likely to enter a strategic standstill. India’s participation in the SCO will do more harm than good in the short and medium term.

 

Beijing sees SCO as a key platform to address the security issues affecting Xinjiang. To quote Xiao, “At present, Xinjiang is at a critical stage in terms of stability and growth. In recent years, security coordination in the SCO has been largely related to Xinjiang… However, China and India have disagreements on anti-terrorism.”

Russia and China would have a convergence insofar as it is a matter of time before the US wades into India-China tensions. (Alas, many war mongers in India are easily identifiable as people owing fealty to US interests.) Washington will wait for tensions to aggravate so that it is seen as responding to India’s plea for help. A commentary in Global Times newspaper today took note of this:

There are certain forces in the West that are instigating a military clash between China and India, from which they can seek strategic benefits at no cost to themselves. Washington applied this scheme in the South China Sea disputes… In fact, neither China nor India wants a war. China has addressed most of its boundary issues with its neighbors through negotiations.

More by russia-insider