Reuters news agency always gives a coloured version of geopolitical events which is aligned to globalists’ world order.
It means nations and individuals who put their own country first are victims of their biased coverage.
What is globalists world order?
Globalists world order is free trade which on paper appears exemplary as it ostensibly allows goods and capital to move freely.
In truth, it’s a tool for developed nations with capital to burden developing world under crushing debt and thus malleable to the extraction of their resources and assets.
Free trade of goods and bullion is a misnomer as it is subject to price machinations determined in London which, gliding on currency manipulation, make the rich richer and poor poorer.
So when Reuters become handmaiden of these globalists, and shape one billion people daily through its thousands of journalists in 165 countries which cater to TV networks and newspapers worldwide and earned them $1.5 billion profit last year, it’s not just the slant in their coverage — it’s a device to make humanity remain stuck in the narrative where sovereign nations are authoritarian while globalists are beacon of human freedom, democracy and rules-based world order even though nobody has seen or read what these rules are.
Indeed, these “rules-based order” have never been written or documented. NEVER. It’s not in the United Nations nor framed in any commission. It’s just in the mind of globalists. Reuters, and other such news agencies, perpetuate it to keep us in fog.
The job of such agencies is to divide the world between good and evil where globalists are good and evils are the likes of Putin and Xi – and Trump, now that he is in Oval Office —who refuse to play this game.
US-China Narrative
So far, before Trump came to office, we were fed that the United States and China are fighting an existential battle.
(a) That Trump first took out Venezuela and now Iran can’t get its oil out strangulating China and its massive oil needs through fatal strategic maritime chokepoints;
(b) That China imports 90% of Iran’s oil and is propping up IRGC so that Trump remains quagmired in Persian Gulf and his presidency is gutted in midterms in November.
Yet, against this narrative, we are seeing rare bonhomie between Trump and Xi in China.
(a) At a banquet with 47 most distinguished guests, Xi looked at Trump and said the latter is “Making America Great Again” and Americans “are ushering in a new chapter in the history of the nation;”
(b) Trump, on his part, said people don’t know it but he and XI talk regularly on phone on contentious issues.
Does it involve Strait of Hormuz? You bet. Both agree that the Strait of Hormuz should have free passage for commercial ships; that charging toll is not right; that these are international waterways (and not Iran’s private waters when it comes to international trade).
Then surely Trump and Xi must have argued about the squeeze of oil supply to China due to current crisis? NO. Trump says Chinese ships are going to “Texas, Louisiana, Alaska” to buy American oil.
This is nothing less than a bombshell.
It conveys that instead of hating the United States for what it did to Iran, it’s major oil supplier, China is rewarding the United States by buying its oil!
Now all this goes against the narrative which agencies such as Reuters peddle to us.
Reuters’ Fake News
So today we have Reuters concocting a friction between the US and China — over who else but Taiwan.
To the remark of Xi that if the Taiwan issue is not handled carefully, it could lead to clashes and conflicts between the two nations, Reuters quotes secretary of state Marco Rubio as saying that “they always raise it on their side and we always make clear our position.”
Here’s the text link to Rubio’s interview to the NBC.
As one could read, in the attributed Rubio’s sentence “they always raise it on their side and we always make clear our position” there is a gap of four paras and nearly 300 words!
But Reuters has joined these two separate statements and made it one. The basic journalism should have made them write : “They always raise it on their side…and we always make clear our position.”
Even with three dots between the two separate sentences, this would be a fake reportage.
Rubio explained the US “position always”has been that China shouldn’t look to forcefully occupy Taiwan.
Rubio also said that China “wants some vote or a referendum in Taiwan that agrees to fold in.”
This is anything but expansionist China on Taiwan even though only 12 rather inconsequential nations recognize Taiwan as independent.
It is “One China” for almost the entire world.
Instead Reuters make it appear that China and US are squaring up against each other on Taiwan.
This is not mischief. This is poisoning humanity for an impending doom.
Reuters of course would never mention that the Trump administration hasn’t yet released $14 billion worth of weapons to Taiwan.
Just a little background on Reuters.
In 1977, Rolling Stone and the New York Times reported that according to information from CIA officials, Reuters worked alongside CIA.
In 2019, the UK Foreign office released archival documents confirming it had provided 350,000 British pounds sterling to Reuters over four years in the 70s to help it expand its operations in the Middle East.
Earlier, the UK government had already been funding the Latin American department of Reuters through a shell company.
In 2020, Reuters ran a fake story of an “obscure Indian cyber firm spied on politicians, investors worldwide” and as the Indian authorities reacted and grilled Reuters correspondents for nine hours, the Indian media went berserk. As per wikipedia: A senior Reuters director contacted media outlets and asked them to take down their posts.
How To Spot Media Lies
A gentle request to readers and more so to media outlets. When you read or publish such stories, the first think you should ask: “What’s the source.”
Inanities such as “person with access to high command” or “those in the know of matter” or “one who refuses to be named” or “sources” and you should immediately doubt it.
Media outlets should look to authenticate from original sources than swallow the lies which agencies like Reuters peddle.
It’s not a matter of one bad report or one misjudgement. It’s a misinformation agenda where hundreds of billions of dollars are spent to keep us in dark.
To show some as heroes who in reality would be happy to see us dead —and some as villains who actually wish to free us from this bondage.
Till readers wake up, and media houses are vigilant, agencies like Reuters have a free pass to sell lies which they have been doing for over a century.
